Thursday, July 18, 2013

Meat Inspection


Ever since the publishing of "The Jungle" in the early 1900s, journalism and the American public have been interested in the state of the meat industry. The reason for this has been because of the often gross oversight of food inspectors concerning the meat processing industry. In the early 1900s, the conditions in which meat were processed were abysmal, and today, while the Pure Food and Drug Acts have many provisions dictating the inspection of factories and processing techniques, the actual enforcement of these provisions has been spotty at best.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=117992&page=1

The first widespread evidence of recent oversight was seen in the 2008 pandemic of news stories and undercover investigations into "downer cows" and other violations in California dairy and meat processing plants. (A downer cow is a cow that is too sick or tired to stand up by itself. The taped violation involved a worker at a plant lifting one of these cows with a forklift and prodding it with a forklift.). Subsequent investigation proved that abuse and incorporation of downer cows into the food supply was not uncommon.
http://usfoodpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/01/humane-society-video-of-workers-abusing.html
Inspections had not found the violations and the livestock were rarely screened for abuse or illness at more than a perfunctory level. Depositions from a congressional hearing state as much:


"In fact, in November 2008 the Inspector General found that FSIS had been in the slaughter plant where those scenes of abuse were recorded and found no problems, just months before the undercover video was shot."

While the 2008 Farm Bill and many amendments to state and federal inspection programs were made, amendments did not fix the matter. The issue of staffing still remained:

"there are just not enough inspectors to keep up with the large volume of livestock going through slaughter to enforce the act and all food safety laws and regulations. We are still experiencing serious staffing shortages in various parts of the country."

Even when there are inspectors, there are issues:

"Inspectors from over half of the plants surveyed reported that additional guidance and training are needed. In particular, when asked about seven areas of enforcement, such as animal sensibility,inspectors' responses ranged from over 40 to nearly 60 percent that they need more guidance and training. Others have called for more training, including USDA's Inspector General, major industry associations, and the Humane Society."

In short, the government is failing to inspect meat and the treatment of animals the way the law intends. This type of oversight is a plague among all countries, it would seem; given the horse meat incidents in recent months where horse meat was served to unknowing European consumers. Some people think that a similar incident could happen in the US, however. With the current regulatory enforcement as spotty as it is, those beliefs are not likely unfounded:


So, here's a question. With the regulatory system the way it is, how safe is the average pound of ground beef? Has it really been inspected, or has the plant that produces it cut corners and bypassed the proper regulations? What's the likelihood of the average consumer ever knowing that the pound of meat is safe and ready for consumption - by themselves, their children, or perhaps their elderly parents? 

Friday, July 12, 2013

Foreign Aid

While it may not take up a significant amount of the budget, foreign aid still consists of large amounts of money - relative to the amounts that most Americans see every day. Over the past few years, the daily contributions to various international interests has reached billions - this may not mean much to a trillion-dollar government, but for many people, millions of dollars spent every day means more than the percentage that the government posts in its budget.

And even if the government can rightfully claim the cost is minuscule in comparison to its other fiscal obligations, there is still the question of where, exactly, the money is going. In the following articles, there are sources from the budget and also interpretive graphs by analysts showing the money trails.

This one talks about Egyptian aid:
http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_23627541/faq-us-aid-egypt

This is a primary source finder of sorts:
http://www.usaid.gov/results-and-data/budget-spending/foreign-assistance-dashboard

This is a graphic representation of spent money:
http://ifamericansknew.org/stats/usaid.html

Finally, I pose the question, even if the money goes to recognized governments, who exactly processes the aid and where does it end up? Are rulers and officials building bridges or mansions with the money we give them. Are they buying clothes and building materials or weapons and items of personal interests. With the organization being as obfuscated as it is in many foreign countries, there may be few ways to find out, and perhaps it is not inappropriate to wonder, does the government itself know? If they had the means to know, would they care?











Thursday, July 11, 2013

July 11, 2013

Fawkes' News 

Our mission is to provide to you:

news of the wrongdoings of big government and other big institutions
news of the protests and other actions opposing these wrongdoings

Today's image:
chalk art protests big banks
Today's links: