Thursday, July 18, 2013

Meat Inspection


Ever since the publishing of "The Jungle" in the early 1900s, journalism and the American public have been interested in the state of the meat industry. The reason for this has been because of the often gross oversight of food inspectors concerning the meat processing industry. In the early 1900s, the conditions in which meat were processed were abysmal, and today, while the Pure Food and Drug Acts have many provisions dictating the inspection of factories and processing techniques, the actual enforcement of these provisions has been spotty at best.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=117992&page=1

The first widespread evidence of recent oversight was seen in the 2008 pandemic of news stories and undercover investigations into "downer cows" and other violations in California dairy and meat processing plants. (A downer cow is a cow that is too sick or tired to stand up by itself. The taped violation involved a worker at a plant lifting one of these cows with a forklift and prodding it with a forklift.). Subsequent investigation proved that abuse and incorporation of downer cows into the food supply was not uncommon.
http://usfoodpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/01/humane-society-video-of-workers-abusing.html
Inspections had not found the violations and the livestock were rarely screened for abuse or illness at more than a perfunctory level. Depositions from a congressional hearing state as much:


"In fact, in November 2008 the Inspector General found that FSIS had been in the slaughter plant where those scenes of abuse were recorded and found no problems, just months before the undercover video was shot."

While the 2008 Farm Bill and many amendments to state and federal inspection programs were made, amendments did not fix the matter. The issue of staffing still remained:

"there are just not enough inspectors to keep up with the large volume of livestock going through slaughter to enforce the act and all food safety laws and regulations. We are still experiencing serious staffing shortages in various parts of the country."

Even when there are inspectors, there are issues:

"Inspectors from over half of the plants surveyed reported that additional guidance and training are needed. In particular, when asked about seven areas of enforcement, such as animal sensibility,inspectors' responses ranged from over 40 to nearly 60 percent that they need more guidance and training. Others have called for more training, including USDA's Inspector General, major industry associations, and the Humane Society."

In short, the government is failing to inspect meat and the treatment of animals the way the law intends. This type of oversight is a plague among all countries, it would seem; given the horse meat incidents in recent months where horse meat was served to unknowing European consumers. Some people think that a similar incident could happen in the US, however. With the current regulatory enforcement as spotty as it is, those beliefs are not likely unfounded:


So, here's a question. With the regulatory system the way it is, how safe is the average pound of ground beef? Has it really been inspected, or has the plant that produces it cut corners and bypassed the proper regulations? What's the likelihood of the average consumer ever knowing that the pound of meat is safe and ready for consumption - by themselves, their children, or perhaps their elderly parents? 

1 comment:

  1. Even for those of us who love a good steak or a chicken barbecue, the slaughter and meat processing are things we just don't like to think about. We don't want to see them. This is exactly the reason this business tends to veer off track, moreso than others: if nobody's watching then the people running the operations cut corners to reduce costs. They can make $100 if they process a sick animal instead of discarding it, they can reduce their labor costs if they skimp on worker safety, they can save on labor and water if they do less cleaning of their equipment and processing rooms.. This is what I call the "first law of Humanics" - if people can cheat and get away with it, then they will.
    This is why the monitoring and inspections by agencies like the USDA and OSHA are essential.
    So what do you do when the monitoring and inspecting agencies don't do their job - because the agencies are under funded or they become lazy or corrupt? Traditionally the press is the watchdog that watches the watchers. But in the meat processing business, with the public's strong inclination to turn their eyes the other way, I think it makes sense to have something more than just the press.
    I'd suggest that a non-profit organization with volunteer contributors might best do the uberwatchdog job. There are many intellegent people out there with time on their hands and with access to good information seeking and organizing tools . They might model their uberwatchdog organization along the lines of the non-profit, nearly all-volunteer organization Wikipedia (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia). What do you think?

    ReplyDelete